# Discrepancy between Flashbots API and Etherscan labels

**URL:** https://collective.flashbots.net/t/discrepancy-between-flashbots-api-and-etherscan-labels/391
**Category:** Data
**Created:** [September 27, 2022, 7:18pm UTC](https://collective.flashbots.net/t/discrepancy-between-flashbots-api-and-etherscan-labels/391 "2022-09-27T19:18:59Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![marius.zoican](https://collective.flashbots.net/user_avatar/collective.flashbots.net/marius.zoican/32/368_2.png) [@marius.zoican](https://collective.flashbots.net/u/marius.zoican)
#### Post date: [September 27, 2022, 7:19pm UTC](https://collective.flashbots.net/t/discrepancy-between-flashbots-api-and-etherscan-labels/391/1 "2022-09-27T19:19:00Z")

</div>

Hello,

I was trying to identify Flashbots transactions that add JIT liquidity. In doing that, I see a number of blocks that are not captured by the Flashbots blocks API, and yet are labelled as Flashbots on the Etherscan website. Does anyone know why? For example, take block 12710108.

Thanks so much!